🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.